WIKIPEDIA says...."Synchronicity is the experience of two or more events, that are apparently causally unrelated or unlikely to occur together by chance, that are observed to occur together in a meaningful manner. The concept of synchronicity was first described by Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung in the 1920s.
Jung variously described synchronicity as an "acausal connecting principle", "meaningful coincidence" and "acausal parallelism". Jung believed that many experiences that are coincidences due to chance in terms of causality suggested the manifestation of parallel events or circumstances in terms of meaning, reflecting this governing dynamic."
______________________
Now how does this apply to the 3 bizarre Coldspring incidents which occurred over a span of 234 years in the same manner, on the same property in New York, all incidents happened between 1 woman and 2 men, with details so identical ....it is not coincidence. It can't be. It is too unbelievably true to be brushed off as mere coincidence. So I am entering the thoughts about "synchronicity" and how that evasive definition may or may not apply to Coldspring.
No comments:
Post a Comment